News
A new Bankruptcy Law came into force on 1 September
2004.
The objectives of the new law include:
- A clear and predictable bankruptcy law.
- Flexibility so that the needs of different
debtors can be taken into account.
- Efficient, productive and transparent
bankruptcy proceedings.
- Protection for working capital and
security.
- Consideration of a debtor's reasonable
rights.
- Developing supervisory actions on debtors
and on bankruptcy administration.
The new bankruptcy law includes a new proceeding
for cases where there are no assets.
The proceeding called "public receivership" requires
a proposal by the Bankruptcy
Ombudsman to the court. This procedure can be initiated
provided that the court considers
it to be justified either: (i) due to the insufficient
means of the bankruptcy estate; (ii) due to
the need for the debtor or the estate to be scrutinised
or (iii) due to other particular
reasons.
- Bankruptcy
Law 2004
- Companies Act 1978
- Restructuring of Enterprises Act 1993
- Act on Adjustment of the Debts of a Private
Individual 1993
- Act on the Recovery of the Bankrupt Estate
1991
- Act on the Priority of Claims 1992
The
main provisions of Finnish insolvency law are found
in the Bankruptcy Law. Any
natural or legal person is subject to the law.
Bankruptcy is a form of insolvency
proceedings covering all the liabilities of the
debtor, where the assets of the debtor are
used in payment of the claims in bankruptcy. Proceedings
may be initiated either by an
application by the debtor (voluntary bankruptcy)
or by the creditors (involuntary bankruptcy). In
order to achieve the objective of the bankruptcy,
the assets of the debtor
become subject to the authority of the creditors.
An estate administrator appointed by the
court sees to the management and liquidation of
the assets of the debtor and to the other
administration of the bankruptcy estate.
In
cases when a court order on a transfer to "public
receivership" has been made, the
appointment of the estate administrator and the
authority of the creditors in bankruptcy
ceases. The administration of a bankruptcy estate
under public receivership is the duty of a
person appointed by the Bankruptcy Ombudsman and
meeting the qualifications of an
estate administrator (public receiver), to whose
possession the assets of the estate shall be
surrendered. The official administrator can be
a private sector lawyer or a member of the
Bankruptcy Ombudsman's staff. Public receivership
proceedings are financed by the state. In consequence of bankruptcy proceedings a legal
person is usually dissolved but a natural
person stays liable for debts that are not repaid
in full in the bankruptcy.
The Restructuring of
Enterprises Act deals with the rehabilitation
of viable enterprises and
the rescheduling of debts.
Under the Act on Adjustment of the Debts of a
Private Individual, individual debtors must
commit to a payment schedule for several years.
The Act on the Recovery of the Bancrupt Estate
and the Act on the Priority of Claims apply to
all insolvency situations
Role
played by Government
Finnish law relating to the supervision of bankrupt
estates is almost entirely codified in the
Act on the Supervision of the Administration of
Bankrupt Estates that came into force on the 1st
of March 1995. The office of the Bankruptcy Ombudsman
was founded then.
Prior to this there was no official supervision
over bankruptcy proceedings and
administrators, who mostly are private sector lawyers.
Supervision by creditors or
supervision by the Finnish Bar Association over
the conduct of its members was regarded
as insufficient.
The Bankruptcy Ombudsman is an independent authority
although it is located in the
Ministry of Justice. The Ombudsman must act impartially.
One of the main duties of the Ombudsman is to
develop the good practice of administering
the bankruptcy estates. The Ombudsman does this
with the assistance of the Advisory
Board for Bankruptcy Affairs. The Board issues
written guidance on the good practice of
administering bankrupts' estates.
The Ombudsman also supervises the administering
of the bankruptcy estates. Practitioners
acting as administrators or trustees have a duty
to co-operate with the Ombudsman and
provide information to the Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman can inform the administrator or
trustee or the creditors about discovered
cases of negligence or abuse. This is sometimes
enough to encourage the practitioner to
correct the fault.
The Ombudsman can also apply to the Court for
an order that:
- Imposes a fine on an administrator
or trustee who has neglected his or her duties;
- Dismisses an administrator or trustee if he or
she has neglected his or her duties
or for other weighty reasons.
- Reduces the administrator's or trustee's
fee if he or she has essentially neglected
his or her duties or if the fee is clearly above
a reasonable level.
The Ombudsman
also has a right to supervise decisions made by
creditors and take
follow-up action if the decisions are against the
law or the proper practice of administering
estates.
However, the Ombudsman cannot substitute a decision
for the decision of a practitioner or
the creditors - only the Court can do this.
The Ombudsman can take action to audit the accounts
and activities of the debtor. The
audition is performed by private sector accountants
and the costs are covered by public
funds if the estate has no assets.
As mentioned earlier, the Ombudsman may apply
for transfer to public receivership.The
costs of bankruptcy proceedings arising from public
receivership are paid from state funds
in so far as the funds of the bankruptcy estate
are insufficient. The Bankruptcy
Ombudsman decides on the compensation.
Role
played by private sector practitioners In
Finland the practitioners acting as administrators
or trustees are mainly private sector
lawyers and usually also members of the Finnish
Bar Association. Practitioners administer bankrupt
estates subject to supervision by the Bankruptcy
Ombudsman and the Court.
The criteria that must
be met to become a administrator are set out
in the Bankruptcy Law:
A person may be appointed as an estate administrator,
if he or she consents to the
appointment, has the ability, skills and experience
required for the duty, and is also
otherwise suitable for the duty. The administrator
shall not have a relationship with the
debtor or the creditor that would compromise
his or her independence of the debtor or his
or her impartiality towards the creditors, or
of his or her ability to perform the task in
an
appropriate manner. Role
played by the Court
Even
with the establishment of the position of Bankruptcy
Ombudsman, the Court retained its general
oversight role in relation to bankrupts' estates.
This role includes appointing administrators and
trustees, ordering them to remedy acts or omissions
in cases of
negligence, removing them from a particular case
and adjusting the fee that can be
charged by the administrator or trustee.
Does
the insolvency system in Finland allow
for:
1.
|
Different
procedures for the insolvency of individuals
and the insolvency of companies? |
|
|
2.
|
Creditors
to accept an arrangement outside of formal
bankruptcy/liquidation proceedings? |
|
|
3.
|
Priority
payment for employee creditors? |
|
|
4.
|
Priority
payment for taxation debts? |
|
|
5.
|
Automatic
disqualification of directors of failed companies
from managing other companies? |
|
|
6.
|
Recognition
of insolvency proceedings being conducted
in another jurisdiction? |
|
|
7.
|
A
government agency to undertake insolvency
administration work? |
|
|
8.
|
Some
form of licensing of private sector practitioners? |
|
|
9.
|
A
review of the remuneration claimed by an
insolvency practitioner by either a court
or other government regulator? |
|
|
10.
|
A
mandatory scale of fees applicable to insolvency
practitioner remuneration? |
|
|
11.
|
Surveillance
of the work of private sector practitioners
by a government regulator? |
|
|
12.
|
Collation
of insolvency statistics by a government
regulator? |
|
|
|